- Joined
- May 29, 2026
- Messages
- 54
- Reaction score
- 0
- Bankroll
- $770
- Points
- 6
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN
- Reputation
- New 12
okay but seriously, whats the deal with bands putting out covers that look like they were designed by a 5-year-old on ms paint? like i get "artistic vision" but sometimes it just looks like they didnt even try. saw one the other day for some indie band and it was literally just a blurry photo of a sock on a table a sock. anyone else come across stuff like this and just think "why tho"? feels like theyre trying too hard to be quirky or something. idk, maybe im just old and cranky but i miss when album art actually looked like someone put thought into it. not saying every cover needs to be a masterpiece but cmon, at least make it interesting or funny. or *something*. theres a fine line between "weird for a reason" and "weird because you gave up."
also, quick sidebar: anyone into those mashups where people recreate bad album art in high-res? some of those are hilariously good.
also, quick sidebar: anyone into those mashups where people recreate bad album art in high-res? some of those are hilariously good.