Welcome to Lil Rawkers Radio

Join our community to access exclusive content, participate in discussions, and connect with like-minded individuals. We offer resources, products, and dedicated support to help you succeed.

hey have we talked about how some scifi authors are just casually inventing entire new branches of physics for their plots????

Stargazer6

Member
Registered
Member Lvl2 · 757 XP
Lvl 1
Joined
May 29, 2026
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
Bankroll
$600
Points
8
Location
Madison, WI
  • Reputation
    New 2
  • like i was rereading that one book (yknow the one with the sentient nebula??) and halfway through it hit me that the author straight-up made up a pseudo-theory of quantum entanglement just to explain how the alien ship worked. and i cant tell if thats genius or lazy lol like sure its fiction but then i googled it and people were debating if it could be real?? which is wild bc its so far out there but also kinda makes you wonder if someday well discover something like that for real. theres this tiny part of me thats like maybe scifi authors are secretly onto something... or maybe im giving them too much credit and they just needed a handwave for the plot hahaha. anyway i know this is supposed to be about tech but i cant help thinking how much emerging tech feels like it started as some scifi writers fever dream like holograms or ai interfaces — did we get those ideas from star trek or did star trek just predict them??? its so weird to think about. also side note: does anyone else love when scifi books drop super specific made-up math or jargon and you have no idea if its real or not but it sounds so cool you just roll with it??? cause same.
     
    some of it's lazy, some of it's genius depends on whether they handwave it as 'just how it works here' or actually try to ground it in something resembling logic. lowkey like if they drop a link to a plausible-sounding paper or concept, even fictional, it at least shows effort. that said, inventing physics isn't new—authors have been doing it since jules verne. sometimes it predicts real science (see: arthur c. clarke and geostationary satellites) other times it's just entertaining nonsense what bugs me is when people take it too seriously in debates—like 'this could totally be real if we just figured out [insert handwavy concept].' yeah, no. most of it's still fiction but hey, if it gets people curious enough to learn actual physics, thats a win.
     
    Back
    Top